Fans are outraged that Duchess Meghan and Prince Harry should not be given police protection during a trip to London. So the network raged.
LONDON – The fact that the royal couple of Sussex is denied protection by the police makes royal fans angry. Prince Harry, 37, has applied for a judicial review of the Home Office’s decision after being denied his wish to personally pay for his security while in the UK. Not only supporters see the ex-Royals in great danger.*
Harry and Meghan’s London trip: fans are appalled by the security strike
Prince Harry * and Duchess Meghan * (40) should rightly fear for their safety in Great Britain, says royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams (72) in the Express. One of the neo-Nazis who threatened the Duke of Sussex was released after 18 months in prison for agreeing to an apprenticeship.
The youngest son of the heir to the throne, Prince Charles* (73), had asked for police protection for his family during a stay in the United Kingdom. However, due to the withdrawal of the royals*, the prince gave up protection when he and Meghan broke away from the crown in 2020.
A statement of the legal action from Harry’s lawyers said: “Prince Harry inherited a security hazard at birth, and it was for life.” Even in California, the Sussexes pay for their privacy. When the offer to cover the costs was also rejected, Prince Harry asked for a judicial review of the Home Office’s decision. Since then, a statement of the legal action by Harry’s lawyers said, “Prince Harry inherited a security hazard at birth, and it was for life.” Even in California, the Sussexes pay for their privacy. When the offer to cover the costs was also rejected, Prince Harry asked for the judicial review of the Home Office* decision. Since then, all eyes have been on the High Court.m all eyes have been on the High Court.
The voices have only exploded online. The British Nigerian activist and lawyer Shola Mos-Shogbamimu (47) shared her opinion on Instagram: “Do you want to kill Harry, Meghan and their children? […] How can you deny them security when they are paying for it themselves and are in danger?
Check out this post on Instagram${caption}
You can find even more exciting aristocratic topics in our free newsletter, which you can subscribe to here.
Many fans also vented on Twitter. But as is well known, online discussions rarely lead to a unified opinion. The court reaction remains to be seen.
Incidentally, the ex-royals do not have a clear supporter in Queen Elizabeth II. * (95) but in Harry’s father. Prince Charles has expressed a desire to spend some quality time with his grandchildren, independently of the security debate, according to the Express. *24royal.de and Merkur.de are offers from IPPEN.MEDIA *
Headline list image: © Paul Edwards / dpa
