Jeremy Corbyn announces his departure after the collapse of the Labor Party

It was 3:23 am when Jeremy Corbyn appeared at his fiefdom in Islington, north London, to follow the count and prepare the announcement of his departure – future resignation, on the other hand. It just so happened that, just at that moment, the Conservatives equaled Labor with 43 seats on the “scoreboard”, it must be borne in mind that the results are gradually becoming known in a county of circumscriptions. Eventual resignation was already looming over him, but the candidate who was leading the Labor Party to its worst result since 1935 was trying to appear normal, saluting the Liberal-Democratic rival first. Many voices within Labor were already demanding his departure, and an hour later Corbyn made the announcement: “It is obviously a disappointing night for the Labor Party,” Corby said, before announcing that “I will not lead the party in the next election. A process will be opened to define the future of the Labor Party and I will then leave the leadership ». Yes, he assured that he will remain as a member of parliament. Corbyn justified his disaster in that “Brexit has polarized and divided the debate in this country.” In that 1935 to which we alluded, Clement Atlee was only 26% in support over the years immediately preceding World War II. That Atlee would eventually become Premier after the victory of the Allies, but his term fell within the sandwich of Winston Churchill’s double term. As the election results have highlighted, the British have not made the slightest attempt to trust the campaign of the A candidate who had fantasized about the Labor Party’s shift to the left for years, the result in the 2017 election emboldened Corbyn.At the time, the polls were predicting a blow, but the Brexit vote was too recent and many Britons were beginning to realize what it meant to have chosen to leave the European Union. Corbyn, who has never supported neither leaving the Union nor remaining (quite the contrary, it is said), made a box with the brand of the Labor Party, a structure in which in the end more voters trusted than expected. he stayed closer to then-candidate torie Theresa May than he had ever dreamed of. And that encouraged him to list to the left this time. But only on the economic and social level. On Brexit, he only timidly promised a new referendum. His “revolutionary” proposals went through the nationalization of large electrical and technology companies, and so on. A dangerous plan that, in sight, has scared the voter.