USA: Senate votes that the second impeachment against Donald Trump is constitutional

The second ‘impeachment’ against the already former president of the United States Donald Trump will continue after the Senate of the country approved it on Tuesday, in a new legal defeat for the mogul’s team, who will not be able to evade his second impeachment trial. Trump’s lawyers had filed an appeal of unconstitutionality to prevent the former president from going to the chamber to respond to the accusations of “incitement to rebellion” for the assault on the Capitol on January 6. The vote, which has also counted With the 50 favorable votes of the Democrats with another six Republicans, it has been produced after a video of about 20 minutes was broadcast in the plenary session of the Senate in which images of the mob storming the Capitol with the previous slogans of Trump at a rally held outside the White House that same day, it is important to emphasize in that case that many of the senators who today have voted in favor of the legality of a new ‘Impeachment’ against Trump were inside the Capitol on the same January 6 in which a mob of rioters, geeks and dangerous types advanced and entered, as they say, to the kitchen in the building, in a day that ended with five dead people. This new impeachment was approved by the House on January 13, when Trump was still president, on a single charge of “incitement to insurrection.” Obviously, the original objective of this process, to remove the president, does not make sense this time, because there is no President Trump to remove.In any case, if Trump loses it, it would imply the impossibility that he could attend the elections within four years, as his objective could be, although this was also quite complicated as a result of those riots on January 6. , much more visibly than during the nearly two months of legal battle not to recognize the results of the presidential elections.Trump pissed off with his lawyers According to reports, Trump has been losing trust with his lawyers as the process progressed and did not hesitate to show their anger as they exposed the defense of the former president.One of the defense attorneys, Bruce Castor, has appealed to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution to justify the words expressed by Trump both on January 6 and the days previous, in which he was in charge of feeding the unfounded theories about electoral fraud. Although Castor, according to NBC, condemned the actions of the mob, he defended that Tru mp should not be held responsible for the actions of his supporters, since his right to freedom of expression is enshrined in US law. His other lawyer, David Schoen, has insisted that it is an unconstitutional process in which evidence, he said, the “clear” intentions of the Democratic Party to prevent its client from running again to the next presidential elections in 2024.