LivingWhat can we do and what not after being...

What can we do and what not after being fully vaccinated

December 27, 2020 was not just any Sunday. Araceli Rosario Hidalgo, born in 1924 and interned in a residence for the elderly in Guadalajara, received the first vaccine against COVID-19 administered in Spain.

Since then (and until the beginning of April) 10 million doses have been administered. Almost 15% of those over 18 years of age (6.8 million) have received at least one, and 6.4% (slightly more than 3 million) the complete pattern.

Although the Government announces a strong acceleration of vaccination, they are still insufficient figures to control the pandemic. The 4th round of the National Seroprevalence Study (ENE-COVID), completed in November 2020, showed that 10% of Spaniards (more than 17% in some Community such as Madrid) had antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 for having past illness. And we all know how tough the third wave started the following month was.

We are still far from herd immunity (if herd immunity is possible). Let us remember that, at least for the moment, children and adolescents are excluded from vaccination , that less developed countries will take time to be vaccinated (and probably also the poorest groups in developed countries) and that there is a possibility that reservoirs remain virus animals.

But although vaccination coverage is insufficient at the moment, 3 million people with the full schedule are many people. So many. And they are more every day. What they can and cannot do is an important question. For them, for their families, their colleagues and friends and, also, for the economies of their countries. For all.

What could the vaccinated do and what not?

Despite the fact that Israel has opened discotheques for vaccinated people, and the most advanced countries in vaccination announce the return of the good times, there is still much uncertainty to define clearly what the vaccinated could or could not do.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States are perhaps the ones who have made the most specific (and optimistic) recommendations for fully vaccinated people (two weeks after receiving the second dose or the first in the case of single-dose vaccines ).

For the CDC, and starting this month, those vaccinated should continue to wear a mask and maintain their distance in public, with people from more than two households or with vulnerable people. They should also avoid poorly ventilated spaces and large gatherings, wear a mask on public transportation (and stations) , get tested when returning to the United States, and get tested (and isolate themselves) if they develop symptoms. In addition to following the specific recommendations that may exist in some centers or workplaces.

However, the CDC maintains that the fully vaccinated can be gathered indoors with other fully vaccinated people without a mask or distance, or with unvaccinated people from another household (as long as they are not at risk).

They could also travel without restrictions or tests or quarantines within the United States. They don’t even require proof (unless the host country requires it) to travel to other countries. Although yes to return to the United States: a test at origin and a new test after 3-5 days, but not quarantine.

Nor do they require isolation or testing of those vaccinated in contact with COVID-19 patients (unless they develop symptoms or reside in a collective center).

They are certainly big changes. And, up to a point, daring. For this reason, many countries observe with interest the results of these de-escalation strategies in vaccinated people in societies not yet fully vaccinated.

Why are we concerned about possible post-vaccination relaxation?

We know, from the clinical trials of authorization of the different vaccines, that vaccination is extraordinarily effective in reducing cases of symptomatic covid-19 in all age groups. Even when infected, the risk of developing severe COVID is much lower.

We also know from observational studies with real-world data in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Israel, that actual vaccination remains effective against asymptomatic covid. And also, even preliminarily, that those vaccinated who become infected have lower viral loads than those who are not vaccinated. If a significant proportion of vaccinated people do not become infected and those who do have a lower viral load, the transmission capacity should decline markedly.

We do not know at the moment how long the protection offered by vaccination (or natural immunity after the infection has passed) lasts – and, where appropriate, when and how it wanes. At the moment, and considering the humoral and cellular immunity, the protection seems to hold up quite well for at least 6 months. What’s more, the reported cases of reinfection are anecdotal.

We also know that vaccines perform well for most variants of concern, including the British variant (B.1.1.7). But in the laboratory they lose some effectiveness against the South African variant (B.1.351) and other variants with the E484Y mutation. And we ignore the impact of this partial loss of effectiveness in the real world.

But, and perhaps above all, we do not know the ability of SARS-CoV-2 – in the more or less immediate future – to evade the immune response produced by vaccines (or natural immunity). Every day that transmission persists – and it is still very high in many countries – you have opportunities to mutate and try. And the future is not written.

In this context of uncertainty, excessive relaxation after vaccination could be problematic. Firstly, it is of concern that the possible “relaxation” of measures in the vaccinated could lead to an increase in infections among them. Still mostly asymptomatic, and despite their lower transmission capacity, they could be transferred to infections in non-vaccinated people, mainly younger populations (those who are the latest in receiving vaccination).

And although young people (and also those vaccinated) maintain a lower risk of developing severe covid, if the transmission is very high, they could pose a problem of saturation of health services and deterioration of health.

Also of concern is the potential development of escape variants or a decreased immune response leading to reinfections. And above all, the combined combination of all risks is of concern: high rates in young people, new variants and reinfections.

Prudence should not make us reckless

The alternative of maintaining restrictions for those vaccinated also has significant social costs. In social distance, in loneliness, in pandemic fatigue, in delayed recovery and in increasing poverty. Prudence on the one hand should not make us reckless on the other. Decisions will have to be made balancing risks and benefits at all times.

There is much uncertainty and the recommendations will change as vaccination advances and new scientific evidence becomes available on its impact on transmission.

The reasonable thing is to follow the rules established by the health authorities at all times (not following them could lead to sanctions). Currently in Spain the recommendations do not establish differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated. Nor in other countries with the most advanced vaccination campaign, such as the United Kingdom.

It is also reasonable that these recommendations be updated as soon as possible, with the advance in the number of people vaccinated and with the new evidence on the impact of vaccination on transmission (including what we learn from countries that have already started to relax measures). And without fear of going back if the epidemiological situation advises it.

In this we must also combine impatience in the search for normality and recovery with patience to be able to reach them without more sacrifices than we are forced to make. It will not be easy to find a balance. And we will make mistakes. More mistakes. By default and by excess. But we have known for a long time that it is not easy to make decisions in these times.

Finally, it should be remembered that relaxation in the immediate weeks after the first dose is also a concern (and a lot) , when our body has not yet had time to produce antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and we still have no protection. Here we do know that we must maintain all the same measures as those not vaccinated. In this we do not have the slightest doubt or uncertainty.

Salvador Peiró, Researcher, Health Services Research Area, FISABIO SALUD PÚBLICA, Fisabio

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original.

The Conversation

To swim with sharks! This is how entrepreneurs float in the face of inflation

The most successful entrepreneur, and the one who can swim and fall in love with sharks, is the one who is willing to learn from every moment of his process, points out Luis Arandia.

#Between the lines | COVID-19. The sixth wave is coming and a (new) variant...

It is not possible to declare when the sixth wave will arrive in Mexico, but now, more than ever, it is urgent that virological surveillance be maintained, points out Jonathán Torres.

Good news! China develops a vaccine to combat monkeypox

China National Biotec Group said it has successfully isolated the monkeypox virus and started developing vaccines and drugs that target the pathogen.

In the new reality, brands must establish messages of closeness

The diffusion of modifications to the organizational culture in the face of a new scenario will be successful if it is underpinned by transparent, close and reliable communication, considers Mario Maraboto.

Covid-19: The end of the pandemic is in sight, says the WHO

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus highlighted that last week the number of weekly deaths fell to its lowest level since March 2020.

More